6 Responses

  1. Lavender Wynter
    Lavender Wynter at |

    Language is such an interesting thing. Is it the year of the Sheep or the Goat?!

    Well, if I was to do a direct translation from Mandarin, it would be the year of the Sheep. Where I am from, our term for “goat” is pronounced “shan yang.” The word “Shan” means either hill or mountain. “Yang” is the term for “sheep.” So, for me, it’s a literal translation of “Year of the Sheep” and that will end on February 7th this year. February 8, 2016 is the first day of the Lunar New Year the Chinese celebrate. This year is that of the Fire Monkey.

    Now that everybody’s completely confused, I can move on. XD

    I did a very short trip as a reviewer last year on an actual Review Blog, and personally from my standpoint, it is HARD. Someone has taken the time to put notes on paper (possibly), agonized over the writing of the story (definitely), probably put it through a few Beta Readers (and I am a devout believer this is where most authors pick up the habit of chewing through ALL their fingernails), then proofreaders and editors to get it out there in published form.

    A lot of sweat and blood (tears and binge eating) went into the product in my hands, purchased or provided freely not being a point in this at all. A simple “I love it!” or “I hate it” isn’t going to cut it as far as worthwhile effort goes (not that I wouldn’t squee “I love it” whenever given the opportunity). I promised myself that “liking” or “not liking” certain elements of a novel shouldn’t go into play on the objectivity of the review. I try to warn people elements that they might either look forward to or stay away from (bdsm, language, graphic detail, etc). I know that in this little area, a lot of authors read these reviews, so within it I also try to give constructive feedback on how I interpreted certain parts and why it works or didn’t work for the story (for me). The problem with my reviews how different I present it, I think. I hope it helps the authors see their works from another person’s perspective, but the authors might not be looking to chew through so many words when they’ve got more pressing issues to get to (like the next queued novels in their heads that are holding organs hostage).

    Thank you for posting! <3 <3

    =D

    Reply
    1. AF Henley
      AF Henley at |

      You’re very welcome, thank you for commenting! Glad you enjoyed. 😀

      I hope you get back to the reviewing when you’re feeling more comfortable with the prospect again. It sounds like you put a great deal of thought and personality into it. <3

      Reply
  2. Jack Frost
    Jack Frost at |

    How can a monkey be anything but happy and cheerful? I don’t know, but the phrase “monkey on my back.” Sprang to mind immediately. Which is its own problems.

    The funny thing about forgiveness, appreciation, kindness and humanitarianism, it’s most often done through the narrow views of the individual. People will be neglected to be humane to others. Seems odd, ridiculous, horrible, but in the most bizarre fashion, it seems possible that everyone in the world could have been the most loving and helpful people in the world while destroying everyone around them.

    I love your constant reminders of the differences between hopes and expectations. It’s odd they should get so consistently muddled in people’s minds but I think that’s because they confuse both terms with the idea of “fair.” Which is muddled in and of itself often enough. You expect a fair review, you hope for a good one, but fair is good isn’t it? Obviously the answer is “no.” A fair review can easily be “I hated it.” They took the time to read it, they took the time and effort to review it, it’s fair that they should review as they see fit.

    Of course on that note if you’re taking the time to request placement on the blog hopefully you’ve chosen a blog known for its fair and informative reviews. Not everyone that reviews your work is guaranteed to be such, but any blog or reviewer you approach specifically for it hopefully you’ve done your homework on them.

    I do often hope people will adopt a standard for reviews. I had a speech teacher who said “for every negative write 10 positive.” The idea being that if you only have negative things to say then you’re not paying attention. But I’ve always thought it a somewhat (insert clever word meaning expecting too much) from someone. Not every negative has to be presented as a horrendous atrocity. But neither should a negative be dropped for lack of an applicable amount of positives to go with it. A good reviewer (and not every review is from a good reviewer) will present the negatives as they are.

    In my own works I love the praise, I hate the complaints, but I prefer the reviewers who are straight forward with likes and dislikes. In the end they tell me the most.

    I strive to be the kind of reviewer I want to see. But I fail miserably because I feel like a giant jack-ass every time I say something potentially negative. So I over compensate. But I do try.

    In my work the greatest review or reaction to my work I ever got was one where the reader was unable to do anything but stare wide-eyed in silence unsure how to even comment on what they’d just read. Before breaking out in laughter over how horrid it all was. xD

    Reply
    1. AF Henley
      AF Henley at |

      An excellent, detailed,and well-thought out comment, as always, Frosty. 😀

      (Yeah, I think I just reviewed your comment. At least it was a good one. ***** That’s a 5-star rating there, btw. It was the best I could do. XD)

      I honestly don’t think there’s a lot hate out there in the the reviewer world. Not the real reviewers, anyway. They try too hard to appear professional and reasonable. There are, however, trolls everywhere and a troll… well, we all know how ugly they can get.

      Thank you so much for your insight, my friend. It’s always a pleasure to read your comments. 😀

      Reply
  3. drawboy
    drawboy at |

    Of course it is impossible for an author not to attract one or the other negative comment on his/her work. They write what they are god at writing, what they are interested in or what they like. And it is impossible to please every reader/reviewer out there.

    But how many times are reviews not very constructive. When someone does not like stories about unicorns and rainbows then do not read it just for the sake to pour your hatred into the world.

    It also is not constructive to just write: I did not like it or I hated it.

    That is not helpful.

    Authors put unimaginable amounts of hard work, sweat, and tears into their work. The least they deserve is such a comment. Even if a reviewer finds stuff within a novel that he does not like? In my opinion an author still deserves a decent and constructive explanation of why in the review. And it does not hurt to stay polite.It could perhaps be helpful.

    Authors and reviewers does not need to be on opposite sides. Unless perhaps some reviewers want to characterize their role like that and life for the moment they can condemn an author’s work.

    Reply
    1. AF Henley
      AF Henley at |

      Wait… there are people out there that don’t like stories about unicorns and rainbows?! Madness! Madness, I tell you! What is this world coming to?

      I can see your point here, most definitely, and I thank you again (as always) for your insight. I couldn’t agree more that authors and reviewers don’t need to be on opposite sides. And I really do believe that for the most part they’re not. That’s why it’s best to surround ourselves with the good people in this world and just ignore the rest. 😀

      Thank you for commenting, buddy! <3

      Reply

Please take a minute to leave a comment it is so appreciated !