6 Responses

  1. 16forward
    16forward at |

    As a voracious reader of as many books as I can fit in a week…be it as a beta reader, an ARC reader, a Goodreads Giveaway reader, a Kindle Unlimited reader and a reader of purchased paperback, hard cover and ebooks…I made a vow to write a review of every book I read. And since that time I’ve written 1,375 reviews; some longer than others but all honest. I always figure that other than just purchasing books, it’s the best way I know of to honor the work of authors.

    Reply
  2. Agi
    Agi at |

    Thank you for your input on this subject. I, as a reader and constant reviewer could probably write a response longer than your post here, heh.

    But to keep it somewhat short and on point. As a personal rule, I don’t write long reviews. I try to be concise in my reviewing. I never understood why people would include a short synopsis of the book in their reviews. It makes the review that much longer. I don’t include any spoilers either.
    My reviews are rarely negative. And when they are it’s because there are editing errors.
    My only pet peeve is poor research when it comes to any medical topics. You see, medical “business” has been my bread and butter for many years and the errors and mistakes in this field grate on my nerves something fierce.

    Thanks for sharing. Author’s insight is always appreciated.

    Reply
  3. H.B.
    H.B. at |

    Thank you for the post. I’m a reader and usually try to write reviews for the books I read (a majority of them do..after my 2000th review I’ve been slacking). As a reader, I think it is sound advice for authors to not read reviews of their own books. It’s tough because not all reviews are exactly constructive. Review lengths differ for me depending on how much I enjoyed the book. I usually try to be constructive about why it may not have worked for me or why it did.

    Reply

Please take a minute to leave a comment it is so appreciated !